Output Review Rubric and Evidence Log
Use this resource with the related module activity and keep the result for your capstone preparation.
Use this after reviewing the task specification and before relying on, sharing, or acting on AI-assisted output.
Part 1: Review rubric
| Dimension | Questions | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Do facts, names, dates, units, quotations, and calculations match evidence? | Pass / Revise / Verify / Not applicable |
| Completeness | Are required items, exceptions, warnings, limits, and uncertainties present? | Pass / Revise / Verify / Not applicable |
| Relevance | Does the output answer the actual task for the stated audience? | Pass / Revise / Not applicable |
| Assumptions | Are unstated causes, values, intentions, or scope changes visible and justified? | Pass / Revise / Verify / Not applicable |
| Reasoning and consistency | Do visible steps and conclusions follow from evidence without contradiction? | Pass / Revise / Verify / Not applicable |
| Tone and audience | Is confidence, vocabulary, detail, and tone suitable for the evidence and audience? | Pass / Revise / Not applicable |
| Source quality | Do material sources exist, support the claim, and fit the date, scope, and context? | Pass / Revise / Verify / Not applicable |
Part 2: Evidence log
| Material claim or requirement | Source or method | Result | Change or next action | Reviewer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supported / Contradicted / Partly supported / Unresolved |
Part 3: Review depth
- Consequence if wrong:
- Reversibility:
- Reach:
- Detectability before harm:
- Required review level: Light / Structured / Specialist or controlled
- Named approver:
Part 4: Decision
- Decision: Accept / Revise / Verify / Reject
- Intended-use scope:
- Changes required:
- Remaining limitations:
- Stop or escalation condition:
- Final approver and date:
Review any revised version again before use.