Module 05 Activity
Scenario
The agent currently decides more than anyone intended. This activity moves the decisions that have rules out of its hands.
What you produce
A decision table with three owners, routing specified over named values, a failure path, and a costed plan.
Steps
- List every decision in the workflow and assign each to a written rule, a person, or the agent. Justify every one you assign to the agent.
- For each decision with a writable rule, write the rule out. Where two rules could both apply, write the tie-break and say which wins.
- Rewrite any routing that reads a paragraph so it reads named values instead. Set the routing out as a small table of conditions and destinations.
- Write the failure path: what is caught, what is reported, and what a person receives about how far the run got.
- Cost the plan before it is built - for each step, whether it needs the agent and roughly what that costs in time and money.
- Look at the steps that need the agent and answer in writing: could any two of them be one?
Evidence to hand in
- The decision table with owners and justifications.
- The written rules, including any tie-breaks.
- The routing table over named values.
- The failure path and what a person receives.
- The costed plan and the merge question answered.
Review checklist
- Every decision has an assigned owner.
- Ambiguous cases got an explicit written tie-break.
- No routing depends on reading a paragraph.
- The failure path reports how far the run got.
- The cost table shows what share the agent steps carry.
