Unit 09.00: Choosing a workflow worth automating
Not every repetitive task is worth automating, and volume is only the first filter.
Volume, time each, and whether the output is checkable
Four candidate workflows scored on all three.
The table below sorts them.
WORKFLOW PER MONTH MIN EACH CHECKABLE AUTOMATE?
invoice overdue checks 900 4.0 yes yes
drafting the quarterly strategy 4 240.0 no NO
routing inbound tickets 2,000 1.5 yes yes
approving exceptional refunds 30 20.0 yes NO
The strategy document fails on volume. Exceptional refunds fail for a
different reason: they are exceptional, so each one differs and the
judgement is the work.
The strategy document fails on volume - four a quarter will never repay a build, however long each one takes.
Exceptional refunds fail differently and more interestingly. The volume is adequate and the output is checkable, and they are *exceptional*, so each one differs and the judgement is the work. Automating the routine slice and routing the exceptions to a person is the right shape there.
The mistake this prevents
The mistake is choosing by how tedious the task feels. Tedium correlates with volume and not with automatability - the most tedious task in an organisation is often the one where every case is slightly different.
Takeaway
Filter on volume, time each, and whether the output can be checked. A task whose cases all differ is not a candidate however tedious it is.
