Skip to course content
Free LLMOps course

LLMOps for Reliable AI Applications

Module 01 Knowledge Check

5 questions. Pass mark 4 out of 5. Answer every question before checking the answer key below, then retry after reading the feedback.

1. Why can't traditional software reliability practice be applied unchanged?

2. 'It worked in the demo' is weak evidence because…

3. Reliability targets should be set…

4. The most under-measured failure in LLM apps is usually…

5. LLMOps differs from MLOps mainly because…

---

Answer Key and Explanations

Check these only after attempting every question.

1. B - The same input can produce different outputs, so pass/fail assertions alone are insufficient

Reliability becomes distributional - you measure rates and regressions, not just single-run correctness.

2. B - A handful of favourable examples says nothing about failure rate on real traffic

Without a measured denominator you have anecdotes, not reliability.

3. B - Per use case, based on the cost of a wrong answer

A brainstorming assistant and a medical summariser warrant very different thresholds.

4. B - Confidently wrong output that no one flags

Infrastructure failures are loud; silent quality failures are the ones that reach users.

5. B - Behaviour is driven by prompts, context, and third-party models you do not retrain

Your levers are prompts, retrieval, and guardrails - with the model as a changing dependency.

Practical Check

Apply this module to your own work: complete the module activity for *What Reliability Means for LLM Applications*, then write one sentence naming what your result shows and one naming what it does not.

Strong Answer Pattern

A strong answer names the task, the evidence used, the check performed, and the remaining limitation. It avoids "proved", "guaranteed", or "always" unless the evidence genuinely supports it.