Skip to course content
Free SQL course

SQL for Data Analysis and AI

Module 13 Knowledge Check

5 questions. Pass mark 4 out of 5. Answer every question before checking the answer key below, then retry after reading the feedback.

1. A complete evidence memo must state the limitation because…

2. Which belongs in the memo's Source line?

3. Recording the grain in the memo matters because…

4. Your capstone dataset will feed an AI assistant. What extra step is required?

5. Reconciling your final figure against a second independent source is worthwhile because…

---

Answer Key and Explanations

Check these only after attempting every question.

1. B - A reader cannot judge the number's fitness for their decision without knowing what it excludes

The limitation line is the one reviewers value most and authors most often skip.

2. B - Tables, filters, date range, and status rules used

Someone must be able to reconstruct the exact population you measured.

3. B - It tells the reader what one row - and therefore the count - actually represents

Most disputed numbers turn out to be grain disagreements, not arithmetic errors.

4. B - Confirm permissions, provenance, and freshness fields are present and correct

Data that will be quoted back to users needs access control and traceability, not just accuracy.

5. B - Agreement raises confidence and disagreement reveals a real assumption difference

Two methods agreeing is far stronger evidence than one method repeated.

Practical Check

Apply this module to your own work: complete the module activity for *Capstone: Analysis-Ready Dataset and SQL Evidence Memo*, then write one sentence naming what your result shows and one naming what it does not.

Strong Answer Pattern

A strong answer names the task, the evidence used, the check performed, and the remaining limitation. It avoids "proved", "guaranteed", or "always" unless the evidence genuinely supports it.