Skip to course content
Free statistics course

Basic Statistics for Data Analysis / Module 1

Module 1 worksheet

Module 1 Worksheet: Statistical Questions and Data Claims

Scenario

A colleague has already written the conclusion they want and is looking for a table that supports it. Your job is to work in the other direction.

Data

Dataset: claim-review-scenarios.csv

scenario_idvague_claimlikely_claim_typesafer_questionboundary_note
C01Students learn better with short lessonsinferentialIn this sample do students using short lessons have higher checkpoint scores than students using long lessons?Can compare groups but cannot prove lesson length caused the difference.
C02The new button improves signupscausalIn a randomized A/B test did the new button produce a higher signup rate than the old button?Needs random assignment and practical-size review.
C03People who study more always score higherpredictiveIn this dataset how strongly are study hours associated with score?Association is not a guarantee for every learner.
C04The support team was worse in MarchdescriptiveDid the March support ticket rate per active account increase compared with February?Counts alone are not enough without active-account denominators.
C05The training program works for everyoneinferentialAmong learners who completed the training what average score change was observed?Completion bias may make the result too optimistic.

Your Task

Rewrite three vague claims into statistical questions and add one boundary note for each claim.

Questions

  1. What claim is being made, and what question would actually test it?
  2. Who or what is one row, and is that the thing the claim is about?
  3. Which column would have to change for the claim to be wrong?
  4. What comparison is missing that would make this interpretable?
  5. What does the table support, stated as narrowly as you can?
  6. What part of the original claim is not supported at all?
  7. What would you need to collect before making the stronger claim?

Write Your Conclusion

Write the claim twice: the version the table supports, and the version you were asked to support. Two to four sentences each.

Self-Check

  • Did I write the question before looking for the answer?
  • Is my supported claim narrower than the original?
  • Did I name what is missing rather than working around it?
  • Would the colleague recognise their claim in my version?