Review facts, tone, privacy, and missing context
Unit ID: AIT-M12-U03 Estimated active time: 15-20 minutes
The main idea
The capstone must show review evidence.
Evidence means marks on a page: claims flagged, changes noted, decisions recorded. Saying it was reviewed is not evidence.
Why this matters
This is also the part that makes the capstone useful afterwards. The review notes are what you reuse; the output is specific to one occasion.
Safe example
You mark claims to verify, tone changes, private details avoided, and assumptions.
Four kinds of mark, matching the four things that go wrong.
Better working habit
Use the output review checklist from the course resources.
The same checklist you have used through Modules 3 and 11, so the capstone is not a new skill.
What to watch for
Do not call the work complete without checking facts and boundaries.
Facts and boundaries are the two that cause harm. Tone and clarity are important and recoverable.
Mini practice
Complete the review checklist for the capstone output.
Count the marks, and resolve every one before the decision step.
Check yourself
Before moving on, answer:
- Which claims did I mark for verification, and did I verify them?
- Did anything private nearly get through?
- Are all four kinds of mark present, or did I only check wording?
